So evidently a bunch of like-minded “guys” (who knows, there
might be a female or two in there) didn’t
like the way the Hugo Awards were getting so literary, PC and boring and
decided to make a change. Well, that itself isn’t bad. But what they did was to
create a slate, not much different from that of a political party. They listed their
candidates, pushed their agenda, and crowned themselves with a treacly, cutesy
name that insults lovable canines everywhere. Then some other like-minded, but
more extreme individuals who are kinda creepy in that “never made it out of
Grandma’s basement” kinda way got in the act and built on that platform. And lo
and behold, they found a foothold out there in fanboy land. I’m not going into
the whole nasty business. If you haven’t heard of it, just Google it. Or better
yet, visit Chuck Wendig’s Terrible Minds blog.
Next thing you know, the Hugo nominations close and when the
finals are announced, several of the categories were stacked with their
candidates. And the Hugos were declared dead. Ruined. *le sigh…*
Anyhow…
Public outrage ensues. It’s all that anyone talks about…at
least until the Nazi romance makes it to the RITA finals. More on that later. But
yes, they’re talking about this on Facebook and Twitter and in countless forums
everywhere. And the more people are pissed, the more get swept up in the
community outrage. In spite of the fury, no one managed to get behind alternate
nominees, other than in the novel section.
Membership in the World Science Fiction Society balloons.
When World Con convenes in August, they have record high attendance and voting
numbers swelled. As always, controversy is good for business.
Here’s where it gets very interesting. And this is what I
observed.
The fans at this event are a tribe. For the first couple
days I was there, it felt like a closed tribe, and I couldn’t find a way in. (especially
since I’m a total social cripple.) But I was patient, put myself out of my
comfort zone and just wandered around and listened. On Friday, I got pulled
into two conversations about the Puppies controversy and speculation about how
the voting would turn out. One of the men I spoke with was particularly
baffled. He has been part of this fandom all his teen and adult life and he
just didn’t understand the malice. He was broken-hearted.
Over at the costume
display, clusters of fans were quietly circulating, informing the uninformed. A
young man nervously approached me and handed me a cheap plastic kazoo. On it
was printed, “The Hugos Matter.” He told me, “This is important.”
And yes, they really do matter. And I could tell it took all
his courage to walk up to this strange woman and say something that might be
controversial. I wanted to hug him.
I took notes at the award ceremony. Several luminaries
weighed in on the situation. (I’m sorry, I didn’t get names, but you should be
able to view the podcast.) It was like the elephant in the room. The groups who
shall not be named. Once George RR Martin said the word “puppies” it loosened
the rest of the panel up. No one choked and died. Vox Day didn’t suddenly
manifest there on the screen. They discussed changing rules and the long term
implications the controversy might have. They talked about what might happen at
the evening’s ceremony. (They were spot on.) Here are salient points the guests made during
interviews:
- · To campaign for a Hugo is an empty victory. (In this case, it was a Phyrric Victory)
- · It’s fine to get behind a book or artist or other candidate, but do it because you love their work, not because you want to block everyone else.
- · The Hugo Awards are the will of the fans.
- · The Hugo finalists should be raised in prestige simply by being on that final list. Make this your reading list for the year.
- Don't write for the award. Never write for the award. Write for the joy and to write the best damned story you can.
From George R. R. Martin:
- · People have to nominate
- · People have to vote
- · People have to talk about and share what they love
- · The 2017 World Con will be held in Helsinki, Finland! (they beat out DC, Montreal and Osaka, Japan)
The Hugo ballot lists the five nominees in the category, and
in addition, has a selection where the member can vote that no award shall be
given. In the entire history of the Hugo awards, this option has been the voter’s
selection a total of five times.
Last night, the voters withheld the award from five
categories, thus shutting out the slate of finalists supported by the puppies.
Yes, some other candidates were shut out too, and that’s sad. But in the novella
category, all five of the finalists were from Castalia Press. (Seriously…is no
one else writing novellas?) As the hosts
read those results, they said, “And the voters have decided no award will be
given in that category.” And every time, the audience cheered. There were a few
“boos…” but David Gerrold quickly shut them down.
Two major wins went to translated works. In spite of the
dearth of women nominated, they were actually well represented in the wins. In
spite of all the efforts to hijack the awards, it wound up being truly diverse
indeed.
I actually did my homework for these awards. I read the
entries and voted for my favorites. Some of my picks won, some didn’t. I won’t
hide the fact that I voted to withhold on several categories, and so did the
majority of the voters.
I’ve heard it said that passive aggression won the night and
I strongly disagree. To withhold the award is an active vote. And I’ve heard it
was a wash. In what way? I’m sad for the few finalists caught up in those
categories, but at least three nominees had the wisdom to withdraw their names
from the vote, presumably because they were backed by the petulant pooches. Good for them. I’d have done the same thing.
I think.
The Hugos are not a judged, juried contest. Its winners are
decided by the fans. The voters. And that’s us. And if you care, pay for your
membership, join the conversation, nominate and vote. We live in an anti-PC
world where Americans are falling in line behind an ugly, bombastic, arrogant
businessman. We are being told it’s not okay to be “other.” To be brown or
female or to embrace alternate sexuality or gender or faith is wrong. We’re
told its bad and our fault if we are poor. We are told that teachers are vile
and greedy and that billionaires have our best interests at heart. We are encouraged not to think…just to listen
to sound bites.
The world of science
fiction is better than that. We are about ideas. Hope. The journey to becoming
one people, in spite of….or perhaps because of our diversity.
I’m tired. I don’t know if I want to write about Nazis right
now. Maybe later. *sigh…*
But I have something to say about that, too. Part Two is on
its way. And yes, in a strange way, it relates to all this.
8 comments:
I really enjoyed this post. Well said.
Thank you, Greta!
I've been to some Worldcons. I find they're actually more of a nation, made up tribes: the Gamer Tribe, the Costumer/Cosplay Tribe, the Writer (and Aspiring Writer) Tribe, and so on. Some people never go to the masquerade and some live for it. Some rush from panel to panel, trying not to miss anything, while others skip out on panels entirely and haunt the dealers' room (full of books and craft items. for those who've never seen one). A significant percentage of people who pay for attending memberships never bothered to vote for the Hugos, and even fewer bother to nominate, which is one reason Puppygate happened.
If you're able to make it to Kansas City next year, you should go. Unless, of course, you're saving up for Helsinki in 2017. :)
I agree with you, Carmen. I roomed with a woman who's a filker and that took 99% of her time, while I was just getting my bearings. And stalking Patricia Briggs. LOL!
I hope to make Kansas City and hopefully, Helsinki as well.
I don't think the Puppies have managed to kill the Hugo Awards (saying they managed their goal by killing off five categories sounded every bit like the saving-face speech that it was). Sometimes something like this needs to happen in order to prompt people into action. I think this will wake people up to nominate their favorites to ensure this won't happen again.
You can never accuse the SF/F world of complacency! All eras tend to end with a revolution of some sort. This could be just the shake-up the (fairly old) genre(s) need.
Erika, I really think that business of claiming victory is really an example of the Donald Trump strategy of loss. Never apologize and never admit defeat. If someone came along and lopped off their hands, these idiots would say "I meant that to happen...I win!"
And Tracy, this was a little revolution and I really, really REALLY hope people took George RR Martin's words to heart, but I'm not so sure. He said to read, nominate your favorites, to talk about them and to vote. What I'm seeing is the vote end, but many people are now settling back and waiting for next year. This is an endeavor that never ends. Its up to the fans to find the best books and the outstanding new talent.
The nominating period opened late and ended early this year, which exacerbated the situation--I wound up not nominating (not that what I put on my nominations ballot usually tends to land on the final ballot--that's another issue, there are "long tails" of what people put on their nominating ballots. When a group comes in and slate votes, that means overwhelming the hundreds of other people who are individually picking things (the breakdown of nominations released after the Hugo results get announced, don't break down to the things getting a handful of nominations, much leas one or two or three or four)).
Lois McMaster Bujold hadn't had anything out since Captain Vorpatril's Alliance. She has a novella which came out a few weeks ago, and Captain Jole and the Red Queen will be out in February. Based on past performance it's more rather than less likely she'll be a Hugo finalist again within the two years.
Post a Comment